• S. Korea orders probe after 10 students killed by roof collapse
  • Dozens arrested as Thai police raid protest site
  • Old Dhaka flat looted blasting bombs
  • 'Halal holidays' for Muslims in Malaysia
  • Court accepts murder charges against 7 NSU students
  • Retailers launch Bangladesh factory inspection
  • RAB arrested one in Tangail on 'Al-Qaeda link'
  • HC summons IO of Sagar-Runi murder case
  • UZ polls: Chairman candidate’s camp office torched in Satkhira
  • India commutes death sentence for Rajiv Gandhi killers
  • Indian police kill seven Maoist rebels
  • EU, US reps meet ahead of free-trade talks
  • Mobile court awards 2 BNP men jail for distributing leaflets in Khagrachhari
  • Ties with Muslim countries to get utmost importance: PM
  • Father killed by Quasem’s Al-Badr men: Witness
  • Newspaper sector declared an industry
  • BNP writes it allegation to EC
  • SC clears ways for ex-army chief’s trial in defamation case
  • Bangladeshi TV boss jailed over crash-for-cash scam
  • BCL leader murdered in Narsingdi
  • Voting in 97 upazilas Wednesday in first phase
HOME  EDITORIAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

Struggle for rightful place of Bangla continues



THE public interest litigation writ petition filed Sunday with the High Court for a directive on the government for enforcement of the Bengali Language Introduction Act 1987, which decrees the use of Bangla in all offices and courts, bears a strong testimony to the state’s inability, if not unwillingness, to ensure pervasive use of a language, for the recognition of which as the state language, people took to the street and several of them sacrificed their lives more than 60 years ago. It is, as the petitioner, a Supreme Court lawyer, is quoted in a report published in New Age on Monday as lamenting, indeed ‘regrettable’ that the act, which stipulates the use of Bangla in all records and correspondences, laws, proceedings in court, except in the case of foreign relations, by government offices, courts, half-official and autonomous institutions everywhere in Bangladesh, ‘is not in force’ or ‘has not been publicised widely’ in the past 26 years since its enactment.
The language movement in 1952, premised on the core demand that the language of the majority of Pakistan, which this part of the world was then part of, should be the state language, essentially epitomised the democratic aspirations of the Bengali and subsequently exposed the authoritarian attitude and agenda of the West Pakistan-based ruling elite, both civilian and military, thereby sowing the seed of the 23-year-long struggle for the independence of Bangladesh. Regrettably, however, in the post-independence Bangladesh, the ruling elite, again both civilian and military, resorted, just as their West Pakistan-based predecessors, to the use of language to further their class agenda and thus sustain the class divide in society. In terms of language, at least, the fledgling state has consistently patronised differential treatment between not only English and Bangla but also the standard and colloquial Bangla. In practical terms, thus, the language of the majority remains effectively ignored, suffice to add, in an affront to the spirit of both the language movement and the war of liberation.
It is worth noting here that the language movement was not about supplanting Urdu with Bangla as state language; it was about recognition of Bangla as a state language along with Urdu. Similarly, the use of Bangla need not preclude the use of English; it is not a question of ‘either/or’ but ‘not only/but also’. In this regard, the High Court’s observation that English could also be used along with Bangla in the courts of law is instructive. English is, after all, the global language in diplomacy, trade and commerce, education and what have you. Regrettably, however, the ruling elite—political and otherwise—have used it as an excuse to merely further their class agenda.
The writ petition, if entertained by the High Court, could help break the status quo somewhat. However, people need to realise that they need to sustain the struggle before the rightful status of Bangla and its pervasive use in Bangladesh is ensured.




Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   

Struggle for rightful place of Bangla continues

THE public interest litigation writ petition filed Sunday with the High... Full story

Indicative of govt apathy

THE rampant violation of the jute packaging law, which makes... Full story

No government initiative for dialogue in sight

CHINA and Taiwan held a meeting on February 11 in Nanjing, located in China’s eastern Jiangsu province. This was the first government-to-government meeting in sixty-five years and the first official contact since their acrimonious split in 1949 when two million supporters of the nationalist... Full story

Sri Lanka: consensual resolution as a compromise solution

SRI Lanka will be one of only three countries on which a substantive resolution, which calls for new forms of follow-up actions, will be discussed at the session of the UN Human Rights Council next month. Full story
  • Online Poll


    Do you think that the government has successfully brought back normalcy in public life after the January 5 elections?

    • Yes
    • No
    • No comment
    Ajax Loader