• Nelson Mandela dies
  • JCD president held
  • No agreement unless BNP leaves Jamaat: Qamrul
  • Govt announces 3-day national mourning
  • Two more blockade victims die
  • BNP calls hartal in city for Sunday
HOME  EDITORIAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

Insurgency responsible for civilian plight of Syrians



A rebel fighter points his weapon through a hole in the wall of a damaged building in the north-eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor during fighting with Syrian government forces on December 1. â AFP photo/Ahmad AboudA rebel fighter points his weapon through a hole in the wall of a damaged building in the north-eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor during fighting with Syrian government forces on December 1. â AFP photo/Ahmad Aboud

... the insurgency bears the main responsibility, mainly during the ‘defensive’ interval, for the civilian plight; waves of refugees and displaced people came out from the areas under their control to find refuge either in government-held cities or across the nearest borders with neighbouring states. The latest largest wave of refugees of the Syrian Kurds into northern Iraq had nothing to do with the government and was caused by infighting  among insurgents, writes Nicola Nasser

CREATING a humanitarian crisis in Syria, whether real or fabricated, and holding the Syrian government responsible for it as a casus belli for foreign military intervention under the so-called ‘responsibility to protect’ initiative was from the very eruption of the Syrian conflict the goal of the US-led ‘Friends of Syria’ coalition.
Foreign military intervention is now ruled out as impossible, but what the Inquirer columnist Trudy Rubin described on November 29 as ‘the biggest humanitarian crisis in a decade’ was created and this crisis ‘is worsening and no end is in sight’, according to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent on November 11.
Objective and non-objective as well as official and non-official reports about the responsibility of the Syrian government are abundant, but that of the insurgents has been for too long covered up and only of late come under the scrutiny of human rights organizations and media spotlight.
The early militarisation of civilian protests in Syria aborted all prospects for a long overdue peaceful change in Syria and created the largest humanitarian crisis in the world today.
Militarisation opened the Syrian doors wide for foreign military, intelligence and political intervention to turn a national conflict between the haves and have-nots into a regional and international one.
More importantly, unguardedly and grudgingly but knowingly the so-called ‘Friends of Syria’ also opened the Syrian doors to al-Qaeda-linked offshoots as an additional weight to enforce a ‘regime change’; in no time, they hijacked the armed leadership of the marginal local armed insurgency and became the dominant military power out of the control of the intervening regional and international powers who financed, armed and logistically facilitated their infiltration into Syria.
The responsibility of the ‘Friends of Syria’, both Arab and non-Arab, for the militarisation and the ensuing humanitarian crisis was highlighted by the US former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s call on Syrian rebels not to disarm as much by the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari opposition to a political solution through the upcoming Geneva 2 conference next January 22.
When the United States last December added al-Nusra Front to its list of terrorist organisations, topped by al-Qaeda, supposedly to tip the balance in favour of what is called, in US terminology, the ‘moderates’ against the terrorists in the Syrian insurgency, it was a measure taken too late.
The US measure was only a green light for the beginning of another war inside the Syrian war, this time launched by The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Da’Äsh) against all others in the insurgency, including al-Nusra Front.
The end result was further exacerbation of the Syrian humanitarian crisis, for which the United States and partner ‘friends’ could not be absolved of responsibility and should be held accountable.
The responsibility of the insurgency, which is politically sponsored, financed, armed and logistically facilitated by them, is now unfolding to uncover the fact that the militarisation of the early legitimate peaceful protests has created the largest humanitarian crisis in the world today by the military tactics the insurgents used.
These tactics include mortar shelling of civilian densely populated areas under government control, targeting public services infrastructure of power, oil and gas, hospitals and health clinics, schools and universities, stealing public warehouses of strategic basic food reserves, dismantling and stealing public and private factories, flour mills and bakeries, interrupting or cutting transportation and traffic on highways, assassinations, extrajudicial killings and public beheadings, suicide bombings in city centres, targeting and besieging minorities, destroying and desecrating all religious and historic relics, flooding Syria with tens of thousands of foreign mercenary fighters obsessed by the al-Qaeda-like bizarre interpretations of Islam who violently compete among themselves for local leadership and war exploits because they are controlled by competing foreign intelligence agencies, and subjecting the population who come under their control to their brand of Islamic law courts, fatwas and orders, which dumped women out of society altogether to be reserved only for their sexual needs, etc.
However, exploiting the fact that the regular army was deployed along some seventy miles of the ceasefire line for a confrontation with the Israeli Occupation Forces on the Syrian Golan Heights and trained for a regular warfare, their strategic military tactic was from the start to entrench themselves among the civilian population, using them as human shields, in countryside towns and villages where the army has no presence and where even the police and security agencies maintain minimal presence or none at all.
The early successes of the insurgents were military exploits against peaceful civilians; they were not achieved in military vs. military battles. It was enough for a few rebels to hold any such peaceful town or village hostage, but it needs an army operation to kick them out.
Except for the northern city of ar-Raqqah, which Da’Äsh turned into what the Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar on November 8 defined as ‘Syria’s answer to (Afghanistan’s) Kandahar — the birthplace of the Taliban’ since the rebels stormed the city in early March, the Syrian state maintains control and presence in all the major cities.
But the official Arab Syrian Army had been on the defensive for some two years since the eruption of the insurgency in 2011. It needed this time to adapt, train and allocate counter insurgency units to fight in irregular city wars.
Since its strategic victory in al-Qaseer early last June it has gone on the offensive and is rapidly gaining more ground and achieving successive successes ever since.
However, the insurgency bears the main responsibility, mainly during the ‘defensive’ interval, for the civilian plight; waves of refugees and displaced people came out from the areas under their control to find refuge either in government-held cities or across the nearest borders with neighbouring states. The latest largest wave of refugees of the Syrian Kurds into northern Iraq had nothing to do with the government and was caused by infighting among insurgents.
The fact that the Syrian state and government were reacting rather than acting against the insurgency is now coming to light. This fact is explained better by the UK-based opposition Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which reported on this December 3 that it had documented the death of (50,927) government soldiers versus (36,228) insurgents including (6,261) non-Syrian fighters.
Rebel infiltration into countryside towns and villages was the main reason for more than two million internally displaced civilians who left their homes as soon as they could out of fear either of the rebels themselves and their practices or the inevitable government retaliation. They were taken care of by the government in government shelters.
In addition to Christians and other minorities targeted by the rebels who posture as the defenders of Sunni Islam, most of the refugees and those displaced are Sunni Muslim Syrians and more than one million of them are hosted by their compatriot Alawites in the west of the country, a fact that refutes the narrative of the US government and media about a ‘civil’ and ‘sectarian’ war in the country.
Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist based in Birzeit, West Bank of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. nassernicola@ymail.com.




Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   

Ruling partyâs India game and Bangladeshâs shame

THE Indian foreign secretary, Sujatha Singh, who left Dhaka Thursday... Full story

Save water bodies first

THE plan of the Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority to... Full story

Insurgency responsible for civilian plight of Syrians

A rebel fighter points his weapon through a hole in the wall of a damaged building in the north-eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor during fighting with Syrian government forces on December 1. â AFP photo/Ahmad Aboud
... the insurgency bears the main responsibility, mainly during the âdefensiveâ interval, for the civilian plight; waves of refugees and displaced people came out from the areas under their control to find refuge either in government-held cities or across... Full story
  • Online Poll


    Do you think that the government has successfully brought back normalcy in public life after the January 5 elections?

    • Yes
    • No
    • No comment
    Ajax Loader