• ACC stands bereft of public credibility
  • A welcome move
  • Sluggish education process
  • Place of zero in mathematics
  • Eight things I miss about the Cold War
  • Emerging Bangladesh: A story of enterprise and synergy
  • Fusion music moves audience
  • Asha was nervous acting with Anupam Kher
  • French ground troops in close-quarter combat with Islamists
  • Pakistan accuses India of ‘warmongering’
  • JS body unhappy at commercial wings’ failure
  • BB starts scrutinising 26 banks’ profit, asset quality
  • Condition deteriorating: physician
  • Asif’s condition not out of danger: physician
  • No Pakistanis, but show on
  • Last-minute PCB decision puts franchises in trouble
  • Govt slacks on price control of 91pc drugs
  • 5 men lynched after boy shot dead
  • Police attack on pickets marks hartal
  • Court accepts charge sheetCourt accepts charge sheet
  • JS panel clears contempt of court bill
  • US cutter ship, faster boats to join Bangladesh navy, coast guard
HOME  NATIONAL
  
Print Friendly and PDF

JS panel clears contempt of court bill

Staff Correspondent

The parliamentary panel on law ministry on Wednesday cleared the Contempt of Courts Bill- 2011 that keeps provisions to exempt public servants from contempt proceedings after retirement and the media if they publish objective reports.
The committee cleared the bill 19 months after it was placed in the house.
Committee member M Rahmat Ali told reporters that the bill would be placed in the house in the next session for passage.
Committee members said the bill keeps a provision that a public servant facing contempt charge would be exempted from proceedings even after retirement and his replacement would also be immune to such proceedings.
It also exempted media from contempt charge if they published objective news reports.
It also keeps a provision that bars putting anyone on the dock without giving him right to self-defence.
The minister for law, justice and parliamentary affairs, Shafique Ahmed, on June14, 2011 placed the bill in the house with an aim to reframe the age-old contempt of court act of 1926.
The proposed bill has a provision stipulating that publication or their distribution would not be considered as contempt of court if there are no logical reasons to believe that the matters are pending with a court.
However, the provision would not be applicable if it violates the existing laws on publication and printing of books.
The bill also proposed not to consider as contempt of court if a news report published on any court proceedings was found unbiased and objective.
Besides, no person could be convicted of contempt of court if he or she makes a statement or comments in good faith about the presiding judges of the lower courts to other lower courts or the Supreme Court.
The bill also proposed not to consider as contempt of court a disclosure of information about the trial at chamber or in camera, excepting some cases. 



Reader’s Comment

comments powered by Disqus
   
    Thursday, January 17, 2013

Online Poll


Do you agree with the government’s move to filter contents posted on social networking sites such as Facebook and twitter and on blogs?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No comment
Ajax Loader

Archives

Select MonthYear

May 2013

SunMonTueWedThuFri Sat
01020304
05060708091011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031